Monday, November 27, 2006
ODE, .NET, handles and references from hell
I've recently toyed around with .NET in C# and I was excited to see that there are .NET bindings for a lot of free game development libraries in the Tao framework.
I was especially interested in playing with the ODE bindings. ODE is a free physics and collision library that is starting to become usable for a lot of things. As with many .NET wrappers, the ODE wrapper is just a set of static functions that take System.IntPtr objects. You are supposed to juggle these handles carefully, because they correspond to some real unmanaged object.
This is all good, but these APIs break down when the unmanaged objects form graphs on their own, which is the case with the ODE API. Assume we have a wrapper for the following API:
public sealed class SomeApi {
static IntPtr MakeContainer();
static void DestroyContainer(IntPtr i);
static IntPtr MakeItem();
static void DestroyItem(IntPtr i);
static void AddItem(IntPtr container, IntPtr item);
// Many other functions.
}
Further, assume that the semantics of a "Container" in the API is that it destroys its contents when it is destroyed. Also assume that we've written our wrapper classes for Container and Item so that they correctly call the corresponding cleanup function in the API when objects are Disposed and finalized.
With the prerequisites out of the way, consider this code fragment:
Item i = new Item();
Container c = new Container();
c.AddItem(i);
What is happening here is that the unmanaged code is forming a reference graph behind the covers, but the available tools for dealing with unmanaged resources can't see such graphs. The .NET process will crash because regardless of whether the item or the container is destroyed/finalized first, the other one still refers to a (now deleted) unmanaged object.
Tao's ODE wrapper exhibits these exact problems, making it very hard to reason about code correctness. Essentially I'm finding it much harder to use in C# than in C because not only do I have to deal with my own code, I also have to consider how ODE maintains memory internally at every API invocation and what that does to the validness of my wrapper objects.
The only solution I can see is to build wrapper APIs that explicitly maintain the life-time of handles as well. In the above example, such a wrapper would detect that the "AddItem" operation changes the cleanup origin of the item and that it shouldn't be destroyed when the Item wrapper is destroyed, because the container is now doing that.
Sigh.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)